Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Pigs of the Future

Two days ago, a friend of mine told me about another friend of mine who just did her mandatory service in Papua (a mostly untouched region).
She told him about how the natives there valued their pigs highly.
They cared for them, nurtured them, and even sometimes breastfed the piglets, so it’s not strange to have a tribal war because of the pigs.

She then commented about how she thought of it all as primitive, the idea of valuing pigs, and thought that it had to be left behind.
Upon hearing this, my friend gave his disapproval.
His disapproval would have been the same as mine, had I heard the story.

What really differentiates us from the tribes?
Sure, they value pigs, and we don’t.
Most of us value houses, cars, assets, etc.
But, do they make a difference?
We are just as attached to them as the tribes to the pigs.
They are pigs in other form.
They are the pigs of the future.

I once wrote about how humans, being the only kind of creature who knows it’s going to end, are propelled by fear to search for meaning or something to ease the pain.

Or in other words, humans know that their time won’t last, so they frantically search for meaning, salvation, painkillers, happiness, security, wealth, etc. to make the fear go away.

Isn’t that what we all experience?
So, what really makes us stand out or better than the tribes?

But hold on for a second.
Let me tell you one more story.

Another friend of mine once sent me an article about consumerism in the Great Britain.
The article disclosed how the country wrongfully measured the rate of its citizens’ happiness from the number of products sold. The countrymen believed that the more a community bought products, the happier the community became.
But it didn’t turn out to be that way.
And then the article explained about consumerism and how it was actually a sign of fear.

Now, after reading the paragraphs above, is there really a difference between the Papua tribes, the British, and us?
Aren’t we all just a bunch of scared creatures?
Scared creatures who try to wipe their fears off by attaching themselves to things?

In the past thousands of years, we don’t really move anywhere.
Anthony DeMello once said something like,

"After a few thousand years, we are so advanced that we bar our doors and windows at night, while the less developed people sleep in open huts."

Where is the difference, actually?

22 comments:

  1. the difference is we can judge them as infidels for loving pigs.. society sucks!

    ReplyDelete
  2. permission to add to FB note...I forgot to post the Luna maya one...but since it is already out of date, so forget it...I'll post this one... :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. yeah, FYI if you want to marry a papuan girl you have to buy 10 pigs (each pig cost 10 million)
    and if you want to marry a indonesian girl, it cost you your whole working life.. hwahahaha

    ReplyDelete
  4. oh yeah, what's the difference?

    hmm, not much for sure,,, you can adopt a healthy papuan baby and you can grow him as smart, educated modern people,,, really,,, children of tribes' chief got their graduation in USA,,,

    ReplyDelete
  5. ... and ladies and gents we actually got another vincent here.. bwahahahaha


    i think you misunderstood this post somehow man, try to read it again.

    ReplyDelete
  6. @Lao: most of Brits are well educated, but remain fearful.

    'modern', 'post-modern', 'ultra modern' society (us) made so many derivatives of that fear.
    While the simple tribesmen haven't got that many, so these societies are different, in a sense.

    que serra serra

    ReplyDelete
  7. yeah, you're right.
    modern societies' fear has more forms.
    they have more kinds of things to be attached to.
    but yet at the core, it's still the same fear, don't you think?

    ReplyDelete
  8. @hub: yes, i think so too.
    I guess only some have managed to overcome that fear, i.e Buddha, Jesus, Mary.
    Thin red line connecting them is acceptance. I think traditional societies have more acceptance, a balance between being grateful and drive for improvements.
    Modern societies tend to forget the first part.
    I ain't no Buddha, so I'm aiming for more traditional approach of life, it would make my life easier.

    ReplyDelete
  9. In comparing these different, contemporary societies to the tribal, aboriginal societies a million years ago, we can all clearly see the difference... The survivor within knows that they don't need as much from the outside to actually do something meaningful, spend their time effectively, and make themselves useful.. They don't rely a lot on outside force, because the main tools of survival, we're all already born with it.

    From the British society's looking glass towards our contemporary world, people keep wanting more. more. more. more of what, exactly? Everything, because of these insecurities, these little make-believe "needs" to start doing what they are made to do, thus they spent all their lifetimes doing things outside while never really knowing what's within and what they're born with, therefore are clueless in knowing what they're born to do, consequently the meaning of their lives entirely...

    pardon for the long comment, but i really like this controversial post :)

    ReplyDelete
  10. interesting topic! im wondering what will happen in the future ya? what will human value in the future?

    In my opinion, we will fail if we depend on people coz they are mortal...we need something immortal to depend on...We need God =)

    ReplyDelete
  11. @michi: there are no difference, the aboriginal clings themselves to pigs, and modern society to money. I think you misunderstood this.

    humm i must agree with you on the insecurities, but hey it's because we're living in a society that demands us to do so. but we can always choose if we're aware enough. and that what makes us beautiful.

    @Jak : humm Good point..what will humans cling on to in the next 100-200 years..? hum3..fresh water and food maybe..?considering the global warming issue and all hehe

    heh IMHO people always have a way in letting us down, but it depends on your self awareness.
    my questions to you my friend, do you really need to depend on something whether it is mortal or immortal to be happy? because it's kinda sad when you think about it.

    o yeah btw nice to meet you both ^^

    ReplyDelete
  12. gaya seorang intelek menyindir kehidupan...

    bagus, tus.

    ReplyDelete
  13. thanks for the comments. :)

    @michirururu
    yeah, you're right. I agree about the insecurities and the clarity of confusion frenzy in today's society.

    but I think societies of the past bear no difference, don't you think?

    if they didn't look that way, maybe it was because they had less options to be attached with and more concerns on basic survival.

    @jak
    whoa, welcome.
    yes, I agree we should not be dependent.
    in fact, I think we should not cling to anything.
    even to 'god'.
    I'm gonna be so misunderstood by this.

    @IMANs
    hi Man!
    you've finally shown up.

    @wongky
    I've got nothing to say to you. there's only a few things we respond differently.

    ReplyDelete
  14. yeah like your sexual orientation *ROFL*

    ReplyDelete
  15. "I'm gonna be so misunderstood by this"

    Yes...but to help you clarify..I think what you mean is that we should not cling to anything even to "God" in terms of "The mortal being concept of God"...not "God" itself..is that it?

    ReplyDelete
  16. precisely.
    how could you not cling to the real one? you're it in a way, anyway.
    so yeah, I was talking about the concept.
    hehehehehe.

    ReplyDelete
  17. very interesting topic, is it the same u've told me in the car the other day?
    Hope i don't take the concept wrong, but i think i agree with u, we are just the same, each of us has different kind of "valuable things" in this life. Things that are considered to have high values, high efforts to be able to get or to have. Still i don't understand about the fear thing, is it all about fear? is that the only reason people get attached to something? i mean, is it probable just because something u've been told or seen since u were kid, what things that are valuable in this life? that is why each person could have different values than the others (considering different background family, social n economics climate etc) even if they live in the same place and age? so it's basically not coming from your own alertness of fear.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Even in fulfilling our parents will, we try to do our best so that when we die, we don't die in regret...so that when we die, our life is fulfilled...and the "fear" of inability to do so is what drives us..

    Not to mention that many people try to achieve their own dreams despite what their parents told them...perhaps at some point in their life, the realize that the things that they value in their life are quite different from their parents...

    what do you think of that??

    ReplyDelete
  19. fear is instinctual so i guess in a way every humans are born with it..and only by leaving it will we be freed. it's really not a concept of the things which driven us all this time but more of a self inflicted fear inside.
    maybe..?

    ReplyDelete
  20. preferences aside, the bottom line is the same.

    unless you're a fucking robot. but that's way too far to talk about.

    ReplyDelete